A 7th grader recently shared his experience in a blog post, Dear Report Cards, You Suck, that exemplifies a major challenge with assessment procedures and reporting of what students know and can do. He says he realized that he is actually a B student, not a D student (which can make a huge difference in the trajectory of one’s life) because of how he got to show what he knew and how his work was assessed.
The only reason you can easily read this is because of my best friend, spell check. My spelling difficulties make my handwriting hard to read. In the past, I’ve done most of my writing in a textbook without revisions. So, of course I was going to get a D.
Having access to technology has changed my world. Being able to type my work and click on a red line to fix a wrong word has suddenly made my work correct. Feedback is another extremely helpful tool. When I was stuck or when I’m just finished, I used feedback to fix the things that were wrong or to add things that I may not have thought of. Feedback is an awesome tool!
Contrary to his profound learning experience, we have this notion that pervades many of our policies and procedures in education that “work” needs to be perfect when it’s turned in when sometimes it’s the first time that the teacher has seen it and there is no opportunity for feedback or revision but the assignment is graded, recorded, and we move on.
Is it the Quality of the Handwriting or the Ideas that Matter?
Not long ago I had a friend tell me that her son was struggling in school because he had poor handwriting. I didn’t think much of it at the time until my son started having to write more and more and I watched him struggle because of his handwriting. He has always loved to “write books” but as the focus on spelling, grammar and penmanship increased, he began to fight writing anything. I struggle because I know that it’s important for his words to be legible, accurately spelled, and correctly punctuated to effectively communicate his ideas. I also know this these skills are only a small portion of what matters and that what he thinks and what he does with his ideas matter more.
Because of this, I have been thinking a lot about how a focus on handwriting and spelling impacts how students are seen by their teachers and the connection to their own academic confidence and success. Since handwriting and spelling are what people see on the surface, it’s not uncommon for students to be judged by the quality of their by handwriting or what one can do in a first draft. Yet, when we organize classrooms and learning experiences this way, we communicate that intelligence is fixed and that you either know something or you don’t, not that we can improve with effort and time and feedback.
The Importance of Building Confidence
Strong skills are built by experience, success, feedback, support, and encouragement (just think of learning to walk and talk and pretty much everything else), which also builds confidence and identities as learners and communicators. Yet, I wonder how the focus on perfect grammar, spelling, and penmanship distract and discourage people from developing as writers and creative thinkers?
In Culturize, Jimmy Casas shared his own struggle with writing that had held him back throughout his education and the impact it still has on his identity as a writer.
I lost confidence in my reading and writing way back in elementary school, and I still struggle to write today. In fact, struggle might be too soft a word to describe it. It’s more like agonize over it. I literally freeze up and can find myself spending hours sitting and producing nothing. Like many of our students whom we have identified as slow learners who continue to struggle in the areas of reading and writing, I often feel like giving up whenever I sit down to write. For years I lacked the necessary skills to read at high levels or write at proficient level due to my gaps in learning.
In spite of his “learning gaps”, he is an accomplished educator, leader, speaker AND author of multiple books. Jimmy’s lack of confidence in his own writing makes me wonder how many students have similar experiences and never have teachers or mentors that show them that good writing takes time, practice, revision and often lots of spell check and editing from other people. How many amazing ideas are we missing out on because people have lost their confidence in (or never developed ) their ability to write?
Technical skills are important but if they are prioritized over opportunities to build confidence, practice, and bring our own passions to what we write, what will they matter? The truth is the technical skills matter but you have to be able to do something with them- especially today where you can type (and spell check) anything you want. I’ll end with an amazing question and insight from this 7th grader, “Is it fair to say that a child’s writing is D worthy when the main problem with it is the spelling? When you get past that, it could be really good. So don’t judge a book by its cover.”
Thankyou so much Kate!! have a nice day
“The truth is the technical skills matter but I would argue that developing and learning to effectively share ideas and communicate thinking matters more- especially today where you can type (and spell check) anything you want.”
I agree with your statement, but it would be super tempting to think that because there is spell checking in word processors, the word processor must be a good writing tool. It’s not. Students communicate using an entirely different method. (I am a professional businessman and no one on my team uses a word processor either and yet we all write every day. I am a technical writer.)
It’s specifically technology such as the word processor (they all emulate one another) that is the reason few people worldwide can effectively share ideas and communicate.
How does this generation communicate? They don’t use a word processor. They text. They chunk out ideas and opinions faster than many writers using Word or Google Docs can.
When was the last time you heard any student say, “Gee, I have writer’s block” when they were texting? I hear professional writers say it all the time. The fact is, the word processor is a poorly designed writing tool and it intimidates young and old alike. When was the last time you saw a youngster or even an elderly person intimidated by texting?
Texting is a great way to write. Sure there is a ton of argument about whether texting is writing or not. Given a writing assignment of any kind though, a student using the texting method can out write their counterparts on a word processor with ease. The texting method allows one to write their thoughts as they come, in whatever order. Chunk them out. Then arrange them like building blocks to create logical order to their writing or drag and drop the non-relevant ideas to some other page.
Side note: The tablet is a poor choice as an education tool. What’s the first thing that happens to them? They get set down. When was the last time you saw any kid set down their smartphone and walk away? Of course, there are a few kids that do, but in comparison to the bigger devices, it doesn’t even show up on the graph.
So why do we keep buying tablets for classrooms with teachers that don’t know how to use them? Why do we take away smartphones from kids in schools? Educators are sold a lot of junk that doesn’t make any difference from year to year. They are also given a lot of free junk that doesn’t help, either.
The answer is right in front of us and many students already know how to use them. The best writing tool is the one we carry with us. Our smartphones.
Take any student from any generation before the current one. Count up all the words the kids in previous generations wrote throughout their entire education. It pales in comparison to the amount of words, thoughts and opinions students text in a single year on the smartphone.
BTW, while using a smartphone is part of the answer, using a word processor on your smartphone is not. In order to make a huge difference in the behavior and attitude towards writing, you must use a writing tool that is designed the way we’re wired.
Food for thought.